Who we are

FAQ 09 Cost-benefit ratio

How do you determine the balance between costs and benefits, taking into account the installation and maintenance costs of the POWERgrass hybrid system, compared to traditional natural or synthetic grass fields?

When analyzing the cost-benefit relationship between POWERgrass hybrid fields and those made of synthetic or natural grass, it is important to examine several variables of each system, which include the initial installation cost, the expected duration of the field, maintenance costs and field performance.

Although the installation of synthetic or hybrid grass fields may be more expensive than natural grass fields, in the long run both synthetic fields and POWERgrass hybrid fields can be more economical, thanks to their greater longevity and availability for play.

The durability of a natural grass pitch can be difficult to estimate due to risks related to climate change, and may also be partially true for synthetic turf which can be significantly damaged, for example, by a flood. However, these risks do not apply to hybrid grass fields, which not only last twice as long as a synthetic field, but also have a lower risk of requiring expensive extraordinary interventions.

As regards maintenance costs, synthetic grass fields are usually less expensive to maintain than natural grass ones. Even POWERgrass hybrid fields, despite being almost totally natural, require less intensive maintenance than completely natural fields, generating significant savings in both the medium and long term, even compared to synthetic fields, if the entire life cycle of the system is taken into account, including both ordinary and extraordinary maintenance costs.

In terms of performance, both synthetic and natural grass have strengths and weaknesses: synthetic turf offers consistent play, but can be slippery when it is too wet, while natural grass provides the best performance when it is in excellent condition, but can fail quickly. POWERgrass hybrid pitches combine the advantages of both, ensuring both natural performance and greater durability thanks to synthetic fibers.

Evaluating all variables, including available budget, expected field length and desired playing standards, the cost-benefit balance between a POWERgrass hybrid system and natural or synthetic grass fields can vary. However, the analysis suggests that the POWERgrass hybrid option may represent the solution with the best balance, providing a high quality pitch that is durable over time, requires less maintenance and guarantees excellent playing performance. Although the installation cost may be similar to that of synthetic grass, installing a POWERgrass hybrid system may prove more economical in the long run, considering the savings on non-routine maintenance costs and the longer life of the field. Finally, the POWERgrass hybrid system mitigates weather-related risks, protecting the value of the infrastructure.

Write to Us

For any kind of request write to us.

By continuing you accept ours Privacy Policy. I authorize the processing of my personal data.
I would like to subscribe to your mailing list and be informed about your fairs or news.